In fact, I would actually argue that the editing is actually worse in Saw II. Sadly, that same editing style is present here as well. It was jarring and full of quick cuts and hyper shots that were headache-inducing, to say the least. One of the major issues that I had with it was the editing. I’m not trying to say that Wan’s Saw is a masterpiece without flaws, because that’s certainly not true. It’s amusing to see what crazy and sick puzzles John Kramer sets up for his unsuspecting victims in the Saw franchise, but really, nearly every film in the series besides the first forgets that telling an intriguing and thrilling story is the most important thing to do. But when all you have in your film is scene after scene of deaths with no real story, it simply makes for a boring and pointless movie in the long run. Of course, along the way we see several scenes of gruesome kills and unsettling traps that will satisfy the gory horror flick fans, and admittedly, all of the makeup team deserve immense praise for their incredible work here. Kramer gives them small clues scattered around the room to aid them in getting out, but no matter what, blood will have to be shed in order for an escape to be a possibility. A couple of people are trapped in a room and were placed there by John Kramer aka the Jigsaw killer because, in his words, “Those who don’t appreciate life don’t deserve life”. I will give this movie credit for having a creepy atmosphere just like the original, but it feels so similar with its story. In many ways, this sequel feels extremely similar to the first and not in a good way. I know I sure wished I was watching the first instead of this one today.Įrik Knudsen as Daniel Matthews in Saw II (2005). Instead of giving fans a reason to love Saw more, they ultimately made them wish they were watching the first movie again. With Saw II, virtually none of those ingredients for success are present. They took fans to new and exciting worlds and continued the storyline of its predecessor in a riveting and entertaining way. Screenwriters Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan took the characters of A New Hope and gave them new and exciting things to do while further exploring their characters. ![]() Take The Empire Strikes Back for example. Developing characters further, deepening the lore, and exploring the world are just a few things that a lot of filmmakers do with sequels. ![]() A good sequel should take what fans love about the previous installment and find exciting and innovative ways to make the formula even better. It feels underwhelming and more or less like a retreat of the first with no new surprises in store for fans. The script here has to be the biggest problem with the movie as a whole. It’s strange because Leigh Whannell, who penned the script for the original, returned to co-write the script for Saw II with director Darren Lynn Bousman, who ended up directing three additional entries in the series and is even set to helm the upcoming Spiral: From the Book of Saw. ![]() Wan’s film was physiologically brilliant and was filled to the brim with many twists and turns that blew your mind and kept you on edge all the way from the start to the finish.Īlthough this gory sequel is not as well-directed as the first, I was even more disappointed to see that it wasn’t nearly as well written either. Eric has to find a way to set his son and others free from Jigsaw’s dungeon.įrom the opening scene of Saw II, it was quite obvious that the director of the previous installment, James Wan, did not helm this follow-up. Officer Eric Matthews (Donnie Wahlberg) realizes that Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) is back to playing his evil tricks of locking down people and gruesomely torturing them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |